Mordechai Gal: M&A expert? What is a merger between two firms? A merger is referred to as a financial operation in which two companies join each other and continue business operations as one legal entity. Generally, mergers can be divided into five different categories: Vertical merger: Merging companies operate along the same supply chain line. A note for this M&A guide is that the type of merger selected by a company primarily depends on the motives and objectives of the companies participating in a deal.
What are the Different Motives for Mergers? Companies pursue mergers and acquisitions for several reasons. The most common motives for mergers are: Economies of Scale: Underpinning all of M&A activity is the promise of economies of scale. The benefits that will come from becoming bigger: Increased access to capital, lower costs as a result of higher volume, better bargaining power with distributors, and more. While buyers should always avoid the temptation to indulge in ‘empire building,’ as a general rule, bigger companies usually enjoy advantages that small companies do not.
Opportunistic Value Generation: Some of the best deals happen when a company isn’t even actively pursuing an acquisition. The hallmark of these acquisitions is that the purchase price is less than the fair market value of the target company’s net assets. Often these companies will be in some financial distress, but a deal can be made to keep the company afloat while the buyer benefits from adding immediate value as a direct consequence of the transaction.
Acquisition of assets: A merger can be motivated by a desire to acquire certain assets that cannot be obtained using other methods. In M&A transactions, it is quite common that some companies arrange mergers to gain access to assets that are unique or to assets that usually take a long time to develop internally. For example, access to new technologies is a frequent objective in many mergers. Increase in financial capacity: Every company faces a maximum financial capacity to finance its operations through either debt or equity markets. Lacking adequate financial capacity, a company may merge with another. As a result, a consolidated entity will secure a higher financial capacity that can be employed in further business development processes.
Lower Risk because of diversification: This goes hand-in-hand with economies of scope: By having more revenue streams, it follows that a company can spread risk across those revenue streams, rather than having it focus on just one. To return to the example of Facebook: Some analysts suggest that younger eyeballs are turning away from the social media giant towards other forms of social media… Instagram and Whatsapp among them. When one revenue stream falls, an alternative stream of revenue may hold, or even pick up, diversifying the acquiring company’s risk in the process.
Big mergers and acquisitions (M&A) tend to get the biggest headlines in newspapers, but research indicates that executives should be paying attention to all the smaller deals, too. These smaller transactions, when pursued as part of a deliberate and systematic M&A program, tend to yield strong returns over the long run with comparatively low risk. And, based on Mordecai Gal‘s research, companies’ ability to successfully manage these deals can be a central factor in their ability to withstand economic shocks. The execution of such a programmatic M&A strategy is not easy, however.
Success in M&A requires much more than just executing on a big amount of deals. Acquirers must articulate exactly why and where they need M&A to deliver on specific themes and objectives underlying their overarching corporate strategies. In addition, they must give careful thought as to how they plan to pursue programmatic M&A—including constructing a high-level business case and preliminary integration plans for each area in which they want to pursue M&A.
Why Mergers and Acquisitions Fail? There are many reasons so let’s discuss some of them: Overextending : ‘Bolt on’ mergers and acquisitions when target companies which are small in size relative to the acquiring company – are usually considered to be the best type of transactions. One of the main strands of thought behind this is that they don’t require as many resources to be acquired or to be integrated. At the other side of this equation, are those transactions that require significant resources on the part of the acquiring firm. Loading up on debt to acquire any firm creates a pressure from day one to cut costs – never a good start for a deal, and often the beginning of the end.
With a world-class management team and acquisition capital, https://www.access-heat.com/ is a uniquely positioned consolidation consortium ready to invest in your tech company. As a tech consolidation firm, we look for organizations that are working to push the limits and move into a space of exponential growth through the blending and reorganization of existing operations of the same business type. Our proven methodology focuses on producing financially robust outcomes for all parties involved in the consolidation process. Business owners who are looking for a profitable handoff and equitable transfer of ownership find peace of mind with our consultative methodology, knowing that the business they spent generations tirelessly building from the ground up is being moved to experienced and capable hands. Our strategic investment strategy makes us different than Private Equity Firms or Venture Capital Firms. We work to restructure and optimize all the components of your business that offer an opportunity for increased profitability various synergies.